Truth Is Hate To Those Who Hate The Truth

The proposed federal hate crimes bill, H. R. 1592, that is being brought up in congress is nothing more that a disguised way to prosecute those who speak with a moral clarity against homosexuality and other objective evils of the day. This bill if passed will basically criminalize thoughts, emotions, and even speech. Goodbye first amendment.

Think it's not that bad? Check out these stories of 70-year-old grandmothers arrested in Pennsylvania for breaking state hate-crimes law by speaking out against homosexuality.

Want to help oppose this legislation? Contact your representative here.

Read more on the topic here and here.

Support General Peter Pace

I'm a little behind in getting this up, but for all those who support General Peter Pace and the moral belief that homosexuality is wrong here's a great way to show your support. Feel free to copy the picture and post it on your own site. I've also posted the letter drafted by Sen. Sam Brownback to President Bush in support of Gen. Pace.

Dear Mr. President:

We write in support of General Peter Pace, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who has recently received criticism for expressing his personal moral views.

During an interview on Sunday, while offering support for existing U.S. policies, General Pace discussed some of his personal moral convictions. These statements led to criticism from various groups and the media. Such criticism is both unfair and unfortunate.

As the highest ranking military officer in the United States Armed Forces, he is duty-bound to support the policies of the United States – support which he reiterated in a statement yesterday. But we should not expect someone as qualified, accomplished and articulate as General Pace to lack personal views on important moral issues. In fact, we should expect that anyone entrusted with such great responsibility will have strong moral views. We should be concerned if they do not have strong convictions on key issues.

The moral behavior of members of the Armed Forces is of the highest importance, particularly during this time of war. The question is whether personal moral beliefs should disqualify an individual from positions of leadership in the U.S. military? We think not. General Pace's recent remarks do not deserve the criticism they have received. In fact, we applaud General Pace for maintaining a personal commitment to moral principles. He has demonstrated great leadership during a very difficult time and he continues to do so today. We look forward to his continued service as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

Real Moral Views From The Military (Finally)

The chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Peter Pace, recently said he condones the military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy. In a wide-ranging interview with the Chicago Tribune Pace commented,

"I believe homosexual acts between two individuals are immoral and that we should not condone immoral acts. I do not believe the United States is well served by a policy that says it is OK to be immoral in any way.

"As an individual, I would not want [acceptance of gay behavior] to be our policy, just like I would not want it to be our policy that if we were to find out that so-and-so was sleeping with somebody else's wife, that we would just look the other way, which we do not. We prosecute that kind of immoral behavior."

It's about time somebody in a position of authority stepped up to the plate and called homosexuality what it is. Too many people continue to pander to the pro-homo groups and let them set the agenda of the day. Mark my word, there will most likely be a huge backlash from the homosexual crowd against Pace for his outspoken statement. More power to him for standing up and saying it. Check out the entire article here.

Tim Hardaway Revisited

In a previous post I spoke about Tim Hardaway's homosexual views and the NBA's reaction to them. Michael Medved at Townhall goes into detail about the psychology of his comments and how he is right in his opinion, just as the military is correct in their "don't ask, don't tell" policy.
Excerpt:

Making gay males unwelcome in the intimate circumstances of an NBA team makes just as much sense as making straight males unwelcome in the showers for a women’s team at the WNBA. Most female athletes would prefer not to shower together with men not because they hate males (though some of them no doubt do), but because they hope to avoid the tension, distraction and complication that prove inevitable when issues of sexual attraction (and even arousal) intrude into the arena of competitive sports.

Check out the entire article here.

The Intolerance Of Intolerance

Former NBA star Tim Hardaway announced during a radio show Wednesday that he doesn't like homosexuals when asked how he would respond to a teammate coming out of the closet. As can be expected the backlash to his comment has been incredible. The NBA has banned Hardaway from participating in this weekend's All-Star game festivities do to his so-called 'intolerance'. Hardaway has a First Amendment right just like the rest of us, so why is the NBA being so intolerant of him for voicing his personal opinion when asked it? What should he do, lie? Pretend that the practice of sodomizing another man is morally decent? Whenever a homosexual activist such as Rosie O'Donnell expresses her personal belief by bashing Christianity no one is saying that she is intolerant or bigoted. So why is there such a double standard for those who actually have a moral belief system and buck the politically correct crowd? The PC left is completely hypocritical in that by denouncing anyone who is considered "intolerant" they are being intolerant of intolerance!